South Dakota Top Blogs

News, notes, and observations from the James River Valley in northern South Dakota with special attention to reviewing the performance of the media--old and new. E-Mail to MinneKota@gmail.com

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Who reads what in the News Wars

Here is how many people consult news sources throughout the day and what they consult from Part III of the PBS Frontline series "News Wars."

Read it all at the PBS website.

On a typical day...

  • 57% of Americans watch TV news
  • 54% watch their local news
  • 34% watch cable news channels
  • 28% watch the nightly network news
  • 23% watch the morning news programs (The Today Show, Good Morning America, etc.)
  • 40% of Americans read a newspaper
  • 36% of Americans listen to news on the radio
  • 23 % of Americans get news online
  • 18% visit news aggregators (Google News, Yahoo! News, AOL News, etc.)
  • 14% visit national TV networks' sites (CNN.com, MSNBC.com, ABCnews.com, etc.)
  • 14% visit newspaper Web sites
  • 4% visit news blogs
  • 3% visit online news magazines (Slate.com, Salon.com, etc.)

Groping around in the abattoir?

This post is a big question mark about the beef packing business in South Dakota.

Ridgefield Farms, that erstwhile operator of South Dakota beef packing plants, has reared up in Aberdeen.

Monday night, Feb. 19, Dennis Helwig, one of the main movers of Northern Beef Packers being built south of Aberdeen, explained the history and proposed operation of the plant to the Brown County Democrats. Helwig, whose family runs the Hub City Livestock Auction on the south edge of town, said he got interested in the possibility of a beef packing operation in Aberdeen when he received a call from the CEO of Ridgefield Farms suggesting he give the idea some thought. After some meetings and discussions with Ridgefield personnel, Helwig decided he wanted to initiate the effort that would establish a packing house in Aberdeen, and he then visited with Norge Sanderson, another principal in the project, to see how it could be done. He was impressed by the chance to take advantage of a source of finished beef, becoming part of an instate value-added certification program, and providing an alternative market to the heavily consolidated beef packing industry. That, says Helwig, is how the project came to be.

Ridgefield's role in all this is bothersome. No explanation was made as to why a company that obtained state and community money in Huron and, then, Flandreau, would default on its commitments and hand off a project to Aberdeen.

A few years back, a number of beef producers put together the financing for a beef packing plant in South Dakota. The plan was abandoned. Although they never got to the point of specifying a location for it, Aberdeen was a consideration. Agriculture in East River South Dakota has changed during the last 20 years. An extension agent told me recently that there are misconceptions about where the big beef ranches are in South Dakota. Most people look at the west and West River as ranch country, but in fact some of the biggest cow-calf operations are in East River, and Brown County has its share of huge herds.

The change in agriculture involves a shift from growing wheat, flax, and sunflowers to becoming a part of the corn-and-bean belt. With corn a major crop in East River, beef breeders can either feed their calves themselves or sell them to regional operations that feed beef. The state offers opportunity to cash in on a regional market.

When Dakota Turkey Growers, a producer-owned plant, announced its construction in Huron, Ridgefield Farms announced at the time that it would build a modest beef operation adjoining the turkey processing plant. The plan was endorsed by the governor, and the state, a number of investors, including the Farmers Union, kicked in funds to get the project going.

What happened then is where the information gets muddy. Suddenly, Ridgefield Farms announced that it was abandoning its Huron plans and was moving the project to Flandreau. A rendering plant was planned in conjunction with the packing plant, but some zoning and infrastructure issues came up and matters got contentious.

One beef producer told me that the Governor had encouraged the Huron investors, but when Ridgefield asserted its management prerogatives and did not take its orders directly from the Governor, he got torqued and pulled his support and told the investors to withdraw their funds. Another producer doubted this story. He said people with that kind of money don't take orders from the Governor as where to invest it.

Huron has a long history of being home to beef packing operations. When Ridgefield Farms announced its plan, it looked as if Huron could regain one of its industries and replace some of the 850 jobs lost when Smithfield Foods closed its pork plant in Huron in 1997. The latter producer cited said there has to be other matters involved in Ridgefield's withdrawal from Huron, including some matters involving the abandoned rendering plant and the Farmers Union.

This summer Ridgefield, after getting $850,000 from the Flandreau Development Corporation and the city, abandoned its plans there. The Yankton newspaper carries a story reporting that the state has written off almost a half million dollars in grants and the Corn Utilization Council another $100,000, and Sen. Frank Kloucek is forming an investigation task force.

There are a lot of questions about Ridgefield Farms floating around out there, and we can only add to them. Just what happened in Huron? Why did they abandon Flandreau? And just how much are they involved in Aberdeen?

Is there any information out there that is accurate and reliable?

Sen Tim Johnson and the unholy uses of gossip

Sen. Tim Johnson's illness has brought out some of the best in a few people, and the worst in a lot of them. Kathleen Norris in her book Dakota: A Spiritual Geography devotes a chapter to the holy uses of gossip. She recognizes that gossip is the means through which people express their interest and concern for others, and through which we become engaged in the human community. However, her observations are limited to benign gossip. She does not devote much commentary to malicious gossip.

Nor does she go into the personality factors involved in those who try to become the gatekeepers of gossip. This is a familiar type. We have one who is an officer in a corporation in which I also hold an office. [Yes, rightwingers, you can blog about this. It is a business corporation with the purpose of making a profit (well, sometimes remaining solvent). I have current responsibilities with the finances, and I have been president. The blog mob, as Erin calls it, can go on for weeks on my hypocrisy at being involved in a capitalist venture and being a "liberal.'] The personality type to which I refer is one who always has all the inside and correct information on everything that happens in the world. Even if you inform this soul of a transaction that just took place between you and an associate in the privacy of your office, this person already knows about it. And if there is business to be done, this person always knows the "best" people or places to get it done. The telling characteristic is that if another individual comes up in a conversation, this person always has a comment on how defective and untrustworthy the person is. Most of the information this person transmits is false, at least in part. It is used as a posture of power and knowledge, and it usually is smothered by the presence of malice.

Almost every utterance that comes out of people like this damages the human community. Forgive the old professor at work, but "community" is derived from "communication." It defines a group of people who share and exchange information and develop common purposes with it. When communication is deleterious, the community is injured.

That is not to say that the examination and criticism and resulting condemnation of actions and words committed are malicious gossip. That is the function of dialogue. What makes the human community dysfunctional is the ad hominem attack, the distorted, contrived, and resentful representations of other people for the purpose of diminishing them and claiming superiority over them.

And that leads us to the case of Sen. Tim Johnson. Most people seem to wish him a recovery and the resumption of his duties in the Senate. The Johnson family has become an inspiration for those who find themselves beset by illness and misfortune. Barbara is a breast cancer survivor who has traveled the world to encourage women to have regular examinations and take the measures that can defeat this disease. Tim has had a bout with prostate cancer. Now he is recovering from a congential brain malformation that caused bleeding and some brain damage for which he is undergoing rehabilitation. Many people are hoping for the best, because when Tim resumes his Senatorial duties, it will mean a triumph for new knowledge and new procedures for treating brain damage.

I have a personal interest in this, because I inadvertently became part of research studies involving the treatment of aphasia, the loss of word recognition abilities because of brain damage. When a close friend of my family's was beaten with an antique table leg and left for dead, the left side of his brain was severely damaged. I worked with him intensively to help him restore his speech, but I had the help of a young professor and his chair in the communications disorders department at the college where I worked. At the time, researchers were just finding some tantalizing evidence that the brain can repair itself with the proper stimulation. Up to that time, the assumption was that a damaged brain was a dead brain.



My colleague was working on using reading texts and verbal exercises that could re-stimulate the brain into regaining the full powers of word recognition and speech. My role was to help find the texts that worked. The theory was that literary texts which reach into the emotions and the memory as well as the intellect have a powerful effect in restoring verbal powers. Reading to patients, having them read, and talking about the reading has a healing and restorative effect. The process is called bibliotherapy, and it is now used in treating many mental-related illnesses and injuries. The key is in finding texts that engage the individual patient.



I saw the technique put to effective use a year ago when my brother suffered a stroke. The therapists worked him so hard that he complained, but he regained his speech in a few months and was able to resume an independent life. Now rehabilitation people devote as much attention to exercising the brain as they do the body. And the process works.



However, Tim Johnson's illness moved some individuals who use gossip for malevolent purposes to emerge from under their rocks. A medical doctor in California who professed to be an expert in rehabilitative medicine posted a blog giving a prognosis that Sen. Johnson could not regain his powers and should resign. Because of my background in working with aphasia, I seriously doubted that this man was a legitimate M.D. If he abided by the standards of his profession (he did not have any of the diagnostic files on Sen. Johnson) and if he was current in the developments in his own field, he would not make such a specious prognosis. I had a friend in the medical field in California check him out, and he is a licensed practicing physician. But he suspended the standards of his profession in this instance and opted for an unholy use of gossip because of his political creed.



The Aberdeen newspaper, as we sometimes euphemistically call it, published two items that attempted to construe Sen. Johnson's illness into a disability. A woman named Roxanne Gill wrote a letter to the editor calling for Tim to resign because we need two senators. Then a man who is something of a community scourge, Bill Welk, took out a paid advertisement also calling for the Senator to resign.



Our colleague in history, Prof. Bob Thompson, wrote a letter to the editor making these points:



History shows us that Republican Sen. Karl Mundt suffered a stroke in 1969 and died in 1973. In that period of time he remained a U.S. Senator but was unable to participate and never cast a vote. In contrast, Sen. Tim Johnson has been ill for a little more than a month and his condition has been
upgraded.

It is true that South Daktoa has a problem with Sen. John Thune being in the minority party in Congress, under a lame duck president of the same party, but let's have some patience and give Tim Johnson our support during his recovery.

Some outcry was heard when Sen. Johnson was dismissed from the hospital and moved to a rehabilitation facility which his family and staff declined to name. Claims have been made that the public deserves more information on a more timely basis than has been released. The fact is that information on the Senator's condition has been released as promptly and completely as it can be established and verified. Those who object to the confidentiality of the treatment facility are whining because they can't act as gatekeepers for the medical information and have no easy basis for representing their malevolent little conjectures as a prognosis.



At two meetings of the Brown County Democrats last week, Sen. Johnson's staff updated the public on his progress. Barbara says that he has progressed to using multi-syllable words and is keeping up with the news and briefings from his staff. His staff reports that he is reviewing the Whitehouse budget proposal and is engaging in Senate business that does not require his presence on the floor. His main physician has described his recovery as "miraculous."



The only bad news is for the detractors and the would-be informational gatekeepers. The Senator is recovering and we will have two Senators on the floor soon. In the meantime, the purveyors of busy-body conjectures and unholy gossip are limited in how much damage they can inflict on the information environment.

That other poet David wrote about the unholy uses of gossip in Psalm 36:

For they flatter themselves in their own eyes
that their iniquity cannot be found out and hated.

The words of their mouths are mischief and deceit;
they have ceased to act wisely and do good.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Just how in the hell did this train get on that track?

The DM&E, which was denied a $2.3 billion federal loan yesterday, has been a Republican railroad from its outset.

It had its origins when the old Chicago & Northwestern was in its death throes. Its current president Kevin V. Schieffer (1996–present) served as counsel for Senator Larry Pressler starting in 1982. Schieffer began working with DM&E business in 1983 when he worked to prevent the abandonment of C&NW branch lines that would eventually form the beginnings of DM&E. He initiated the negotiations in 1985 that led to DM&E's creation. He was promoted to Chief of Staff for Senator Pressler in 1987, a position he held until 1991 when George Bush the elder appointed Schieffer to be U.S. Attorney for South Dakota. In 1993, Schieffer left his U.S. Attorney post to become the legal counsel for DM&E. In that capacity for the railroad, he oversaw its recapitalization in 1994 and the acquisition of C&NW's Colony line. He held this position until he was unanimously elected president of the railroad on November 7, 1996.

In 1997, DM&E announced its plans to expand its lines into the Powder River Basin of Wyoming to be the third carrier that hauls coal from that Basin to electrical generating plants in the east. Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Union Pacific already have lines pulling coal trains from that area.

Those two railroads have remained fairly silent, but not totally mute, on the DM&E. Both think they can haul the coal trains east using the lines they have and without a major expenditure on laying new track. Their opposition to the DM&E plan has not been widely reflected in the media, but it is no secret among people who track the goings-on in railroad headquarters. Their opposition was just one factor among many factions that had come out more openly against the DM&E.

Here are the factors working against the $2 billion loan.

  • When railroads were dismantled in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the consensus among communities along rail lines and rail companies was that any new construction of rail lines should avoid crossing highways without underpasses or overpasses and they should not be routed through communities to disrupt traffic and tranquility. DM&E plans showed no attempt to avoid those safety and community concerns.

  • The opposition to DM&E routing plans by the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., were reflective of objections voiced, but ignored, all along the proposed route. Many communities wanted any new tracks to by-pass the communities in ways that would permit unobstructed traffic flows on streets and highways.

  • The financial structure and abilities of the DM&E to pay off its federal loan have been questioned by many from the start. This month a coalition of communities sued to obtain the financial records of the railroad.

  • A bill was introduced in Congress by a bipartisan group of Minnesota legislators, including Republican Senator Norm Coleman, and with the sanction of the Republican governor, to require that any rail loan over $1 billion be submitted to Congress for review and approval.

  • The nation's largest rail union, the United Transportation Union, came out against the loan on the basis of the railroad's saftey record and shaky financial structure.

  • Energy and environmental groups pointed out that building a railroad to haul coal was a dubious prospect when there is a growing consensus that new electrical generating stations should be run on renewable and clean-burning fuels with more attention devoted to a technology that can use wind power. Advocates of more nuclear energy also opposed the DM&E plan.

Sen. John Thune led the federal efforts in obtaining the$2.3 billion loan by getting Congress to increase the limits on such loans. However, the Federal Railroad Administration denied the loan on the basis of having doubt whether the railroad had the resources and a projected future that would enable paying back the loan. Safety and noise issues also played a prominent role.

But the real power behind the denial came from other railroads who want to expand their own businesses.

The big question is whether new electrical generating stations burn coal or the cleaner, renewable sources of energy.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Champagne and Chocolate Sunday Afternoon is canceled

The Brown County Democrats' Champagne and Chololate Sunday Afternoon, scheduled at Alonzo's for 2 p.m. Feb. 25, has been postponed.


It is among the many events that have been canceled in the region because of the weather and dangerous travel conditions.





We will reschedule this event for a time and place soon to be announced.





However, the next big event is on Saturday, March 1o, with Tom Daschle being featured at a number of party meetings in Aberdeen. The big rally is at 7 p.m. at the Eagle's Club.



Our champagne and chocolate event will probably be postponed until after that day.



The Brown County Democrats are gearing up to help take America back from its dangerous ventures into totalitarianism and the banishment of freedom and equality. Tom Daschle's return to his hometown and his endorsement of Barack Obama are important events in the return of America to its people.

Keep the dates open and watch for our rescheduling of events so that you may hear the word for yourselves and participate in the resurgence of democracy.

Friday, February 23, 2007

George W. Bush finally reaches status of Castro and Chavez

"According to a recent survey of 20,200 people in 18 countries by Latinobarómetro, a Chilean polling firm, most Latin Americans lumped Chávez with Fidel Castro and President Bush as bad leaders, citing Brazil's Lula and Chile's Bachelet as the best. And most of those polled classified themselves as political moderates ."

It's all in this Washington Post story.

Patronizing and dishonoring the troops

It's a legacy from Vietnam and before that a beautiful monument in the nation's capitol has not fully rectified. It is the attitude that soldiers who loyally serve our country are disposable. During the Vietnam War, men and women identified as soldiers were vilified and reviled on the streets. Now a pat on the back and a yellow decal on the SUV satisfies any gratitude we think we owe them. Attitudes have not changed that much.

The Washinton Post revealed in stories over the weekend that the outpatient program at Walter Reed Army Medical Center is tacky. While the stories focused on mildew on the walls, water stains on the ceilings, and decrepit beds, outpatients point out that these factors are just surface symbols of a deeper attitude of dismissal and negligence.

What happened during the Vietnam War was years in the making. In the 1950s, after the Korean War, the draft became a designator of the privileged and the lightweights in our society. The privileged thought that anyone who was drafted did not have the status, the connections, or the wit to avoid military service. I remember being in a session of veterans while we recounted some overseas experiences when I asked a chap where he had served. He replied that he knew what he wanted to do and how to do it, and military service was not something he needed to do. His attitude was not uncommon.

During Vietnam, that attitude intensified. Men who were drafted were regarded as deficient and expendable. I recall on a below-zero day at the University of Iowa donning my old army overcoat to trek to campus. While waiting at a stop light, some coeds made deprecating remarks and even spit in my direction. I never wore that coat again or revealed to fellow students--except for a few--that I was attending graduate school on the G. I. Bill.

Like Barack Obama, I opposed the war on Iraq from the build-up to it. Even though many politicians protest that they authorized the war based on the intelligence presented to them at the time, the fact is that both intelligence and news accounts coming out of Iraq, accounts of administration obsessions with Iraq, and reports of weapons inspectors cast deep doubts on the Bush administration rationale.

But the worst aspect of it all is that no thought was given to supporting the troops in ways that really count. Even though many diplomatic and military strategists knew that Iraq was likely to end up as a guerilla war against U.S. troops, the leaders dismissed the notion even when the insurgents made clear that they were battling our troops. It was the Little Big Horn and the Valley of Death in Vietnam all over again. Leaders were sending loyal and proficient troops to their deaths as a matter of personal preference and contrived reasons. And a huge element of incompetence.

During those times when the public was reviling and dismissing our soldiers, it was not conscious of the attitudes building up in the soldiers concerning the people they were allegedly serving. I recall a man who went to Canada saying on television that if we were fighting in Vietnam for something worth saving in America for its women and children, then let the women and children go do the fighting.

The Vietnam War Memorial finally gave acknowledgment and some measure of respect for those who fought in what the majority came to think of as an ignoble war. It helped, but it did not erase the lingering memories of an attitude of dismissal and diminishment that characterized the time of the war.

Many political and military leaders are so intent on their venture into what Patton called life's greatest adventure that they have lost a grasp on the values that make America. The constant drumming that criticism of the war and debates in Congress "emboldens the enemy" and sends them messages of defeat is the biggest symptom of America's leaders having lost any notion of national purpose. Debate and criticizing government--especially in times of gross deception and incompetence--is a way of saving the country from military dictatorship. The other way is open insurrection--and we experienced a little of that during the Vietnam War with violent protests on the streets and fraggings in the services.

There are more than 20,000 young soldiers and veterans whose wounds, both physical and mental, need binding up and healing. In this current war, that is the only objective that can save this country from disgracing itself further.

There is terrorism to be fought. But what threatens us from the outside is not nearly as deadly as what is killing America from within.

Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
Aberdeen, South Dakota, United States

NVBBETA