News, notes, and observations from the James River Valley in northern South Dakota with special attention to reviewing the performance of the media--old and new. E-Mail to MinneKota@gmail.com

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Harvey Weinstein likes to jerk off in front of women; Trump likes to do it before the whole world

Anyone who has worked in the world has encountered people like Harvey Weinstein.  He treats women as if they are slaves,  chattel put on earth to indulge his whanker.  Men who treat women that way usually treat other men the same way.  Their mentality is driven by the need to exercise power, make others bow down before them in servile, humiliating obedience.  They form bonds with other men who can help them in their quests for power, but they regard all others as their serfs.  They derive great pleasure from fucking over people.  And they make great displays of sexism, racism, and the other forms of misanthropic perversion that titillate them.  Bullying is a way of life for them.

How do people like Harvey Weinstein get to be so powerful?  Because so many people share the desire to fuck over other people as a badge of their social status.  People flock around and support and emulate Weinstein and his kind because they want to be associated with that they regard as the power elite.  That is also true of Donald Trump and what constitutes his base.  There is the infamous video of Trump bragging about pussy-grabbing, and a multitude of women accusing him of sexual assault.  But to Trump's apostles,  those are demonstrations of his power, not offenses.  Trump lies to Americans an average of 5 times a day, but to his followers that is not an offense;  it is a demonstration of his power.  

As the week drew to a close, Trump has put on a demonstration of his power to destroy that sends his base into orgasmic glee.  Trump has found his greatest successes by appealing to and inflaming the racism and misogyny of his base.  He started his campaign by repeatedly stating that Obama was not born in America, and he has since attacked everything Obama has done.  At his post-election rallies, he still brings  up Hillary Clinton so that his base can chant their hate anthem "Lock her up."  But this week he has put a a power demonstration of destroying some of the things Obama did, despite that fact that that destruction will end up inflicting mortal damage on the country.


 Trump's exhibitionism is not directed only at subjugating women,  but at hurting great masses of people.  He gets off on watching people suffer.  It is the ultimate expression of power.  And so many people love to watch him get off.



  

Tuesday, October 10, 2017

Emmett Till and Philando Castile died for your sins

Philando Castile was shot five times while sitting with his seat belt buckled, a friend and her child in the car.



Emmett Till, 14, flirted with a white woman and was lynched

I am not a football fan.   i began my journalism career on the sports desk of a morning newspaper and became aware that many athletes in contact sports suffered debilitating injuries.   I realized that many football fans were attracted to the sport because they liked to see men smash together and limp or get carried off the field.  The irony that we outlawed dog fights but made a thriving business out of getting humans to bash and lash each other was not lost on me or other sports writers. 

The sports editor I worked under had often served as a boxing referee and had made many friends in the sport.  Old boxers often dropped in on him and they would repair to the saloon that occupied a ground-floor niche of the newspaper building to talk about old times.  Almost invariably, these men showed signs of being "punch drunk," which was how we referred to the brain damage they had suffered.  That and the behavior and attitude of many "sports fans"  focused my thinking on the role of sports in our society.  I enjoy sports that emphasize the use of skill and athleticism, but disdain those sports--and their spectators--that attract those who enjoy the infliction of violent damage.  

That's where you have to confront some tough facts about humanity.  We are divided.  The division goes far beyond political preferences.  Or religion. Some people love violence, either directly or vicariously.   They revel in ill will.  Other people seek peace.  They try to maintain a sense of good will.  Some people enjoy maiming and killing.  Others get pleasure from peaceable and friendly pursuits.  The two groups live for opposite purposes.  They have directly opposing values.  This divide is the basis for the cultural divide.  There is no way the two groups can reconcile their differences.

These differences underlie the silly, amazingly stupid argument about whether football players should stand during the national anthem.   In July 2016 a black man in Minnesota, Philando Castile, was pulled over while driving with his girl friend and her little daughter in the car.  Castile, who had a permit to carry a gun, told the officer.  When Castile reached down to his pocket, presumably to extract his driver's license,  the officer blasted him five times, while the girlfriend sat next to him and the child sat in the back seat.  The girlfriend recorded part of the episode on her cell phone. The officer said he feared for his life, and was acquitted of any wrong doing.  It was this incident which motivated Colin Kaepernick to refuse to stand for the national anthem as a protest to the unarmed or unthreatening black men being gunned down by police in the streets of America.  

The NFL men who kneel during the national anthem are paying reverence to victims who have had their lives taken in acts of inequality and denials of justice that are the actual rejections of the flag and everything it is supposed to stand for.  They are not showing disrespect to the flag, but are showing sorrow that the country and its flag have betrayed its people.  During 2016, the police killed 258 black men.  Thirty-nine of them were unarmed.  They were shot down as if they were rats in the town dump.  Those who kneel during the national anthem are, in fact, honoring the quest for freedom, equality, and justice that the flag symbolizes.

Those who say that the kneeling is an affront to the principles that America professes and those who fought for those principles are the ones who besmirch the national honor.  The NFL football players who kneel have stated clearly and precisely that they kneel to call attention to the racist acts of violence that have besmirched the flag.  When Trump and his minions say that the kneelers are dishonoring the nation and those who have served, they are indulging in one of the many malicious lies they engage in to aggravate the racist divide that they have revived and widened during Trump's reign of malice.  Trump and his hate squads are fanning the lust for blood and death in the people who love and live for moments of atrocity.  Watching football players deliver concussions is not enough.  Trumpists defame the kneelers in the hopes that they will be fired and left to roam the streets where anxious and avid guns await them.  

When Vice President Pence walked out of the Colts-49ers game Sunday,  he emphasized the lie that the kneeling was disrespect to the flag and its meaning and put his support behind Trump's endorsement of the Nazis at Charlottesville and the shooting of black people in the streets.  

The killing of Philando Castile was an act of the revival of the racial violence that tortured and killed Emmett Till.     Instead of using the overt hatred of black people as the motive,  the shooter used the currently acceptable pretext that he was afraid for his life.  And that gave good reason for all black people on the streets of America to fear for their lives.  The lynchers of Emmett Till were acquitted od charges against them after an hour of jury deliberation.  Castile's killer was also acquitted by a jury of manslaughter and endangerment  of lives.  

And so the flag flies and people honor it, condemn the kneelers, and celebrate the racist renaissance of America,  as it puts all people of color on notice.  

When the flag has come to stand for the freedom to kill in the name of white supremacy,  it may be time to take it down,  fold it up, and give it a decent burial.  And then people of good will may try again to build a nation of liberty, justice, and equality, and design a flag that, in fact, honors those qualities.  And does so in remembrance of those killed under the old flag by those who said they were serving it.





Saturday, October 7, 2017

Morons are US: Running the country into the ground like a business

The Trump administration has given the country--and the world--a detailed illustration of how many businesses are run.  For those who want government and public life run like a business, Trump has demonstrated how badly businesses can be run.  While there are benign businesses and malignant businesses,  his have been a detriment to society.

Business corporations are not democracies.  They are feudal states presided over by those who regard themselves as  a privileged royalty that dictates the terms of life for the serfs over whom they rule.  Liberty, equality, and justice are not even in the business vocabulary.   The only word that matters in business is profit.  It is the god to which human life is sacrificed, and which justifies destruction of habitat and moral life.

That is not to say that there are not good businesses which contribute essentially to the human community by providing necessary and beneficial goods and services.  And there are corporations that do run themselves in ways commensurate with democratic principles.  But they are rare.  Most businesses regard the public as a gigantic herd of sheep to be fleeced,  after which they are disposable.  

Most people who voted for Trump say they did so for his business acumen.  His business acumen is expressed through the constant stream of lies which are usually exposed, his stiffing of contractors,  his fraudulent scams such as Trump  University, his insult and abuse of others, his bankruptcies, and his unceasing malevolence.  The one thing Trump excels at is stupidity, which sells well among the greedy and malevolent. It's what makes many people think "he's one of us."

Trump  is a typical rather than an atypical CEO.  While people do question the wildly exorbitant salaries paid to corporate CEOs,  they seldom ask exactly what they do in their jobs.  As  I found out during the years I was a business editor,  a great many CEOs are posturing narcissists like Trump.  They are appointed by boards of directors who want a puppet as lead executive who will simply carry out their wishes, not work actively to make and keep the business vital.  They in turn choose sub-executives who will blindly obey orders and suck up to the CEO.  The power of the CEOs is in creating the image of an all-powerful drama queen whose lavish lifestyle is the envy of those driven by the lust for money and power.  That image is built upon lies, vicious infighting, suppression of facts, intimidation, and fraud.  Much of American corporate business is run just like the Trump Organization and what we see daily going on in the White House.  Trump has in word and deed made the country a subsidiary of the Trump  organization.

Many huge corporations make profits in spite of, not because of their CEOs and upper echelon executives.  People who are enamored of running government like a business seem unaware that 8 out of 10 business fail in their first 18 months.  Or that big business slumps and failures are usually attributed to their CEO.  The fascination of so many Americans with flagrant and ostentatious lifestyles is the most vulnerable weakness in American democracy.  But there are other aspects of the CEO character that undercut democracy.  In carrying out their CEO duties to corporations, many CEOs do things and practice policies that are overtly anti-democratic.

Trump's quarrel with his Secretary of State Rex Tillerson shows CEO mindsets and egos a work.  Because Trump has undercut Tillerson's announced policies with his tweets,  the press has sided with Tillerson as the victim of Trump's nefarious ways.   But focusing on the squabbling misdirects attention from Tillerson's performance.

An expert on international diplomacy has called for Tillerson's resignation.  He says Tillerson has been an "unmitigated disaster at every facet of his job."  A comprehensive profile of Tillerson in The New Yorker details how his business experience gives him disqualifying experience for his role as the nation's lead diplomat.  At a speech at the University of Texas, when asked how he regarded American policies when doing business as Exxon Mobil CEO, he said, I’m not here to represent the United States government’s interest.  I’m not here to defend it, nor am I here to criticize it. That’s not what I do. I’m a businessman.”  That statement makes clear that he won't let national interests interfere with the corporate agenda.

The first reason international relations experts give for claiming that Tillerson has not the vaguest notion of what he is supposed to is that instead of filling key positions with competent people, he eliminates the positions:  

Tillerson’s proposed budget cuts would considerably reduce the number of American diplomats working abroad, possibly by thousands. In addition, Tillerson suspended the hiring of new Foreign Service officers, including many who had accepted fellowships in the expectation of a job. (He has since allowed two Foreign Service classes to move forward.) “These cuts will decimate the Foreign Service,” Nick Burns, a former Under-Secretary of State, told me. “The Foreign Service is a jewel of the United States. There is no other institution in our government with such deep knowledge of the history, culture, language, and politics of the rest of the world.”[Dexter Filkins,The  New Yorker]
The second factor is that as a business executive, he surrounded himself with a small clique of lackeys who carried out orders without question.  When he first was in a situation someone obviously disagreed with him, a witness said.  "“He got red-faced angry.  He lifted out of his chair in anger. My impression was that he was not used to people with different views.” 

Like most business executives, Tillerson is trained in and is a devout practitioner of the totalitarian power that executives.  To him working with people of vast knowledge and drop, analytic intelligence is like dealing with aliens from another planet.   It seems  against Tillerson's sense of politics to allow and encourage abundant knowledge and vigorous discussion.  Reporter Filkens writes:
Some observers believe that Tillerson is overwhelmed by the volume of decisions that he and his team have to make. According to current and former diplomats, Tillerson has centralized decision-making so aggressively that he is unable to keep up. A senior Trump Administration official told me, “Where things fall in the cracks is in the area of management and leadership of the organization, and in leveraging the immense amount of expertise in that building.” Why isn’t Tillerson making better use of his people? “I can’t explain it,” the official told me. “I cannot frickin’ explain it.”  [Dexter Filkins,The  New Yorker]

People who want government and its agencies to be run like a business do not understand that the authoritarian principles of business are anti-democratic.  Business executives such as Trump and Tillerson are not equipped by training, mindset, or personal political preference to operate in a democracy.  They know only how to give orders and sacrifice all principles of liberty, equality, and justice to the attainment of a  'winning" goal.

Business executives and business oriented people are unfit to be in democratic government because they are fundamentally against democracy.

And we can seen the destruction of democracy in the daily words and actions of the Trumps and Tillersons.  












Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Maybe we should just have a national kill-a-bunch-of-people day

The U.S. Constitution is a monument to America's passionate love of hypocrisy.  It says in its Preamble that its purpose is to:

establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity...

Then it nullifies all that with its Second Amendment.  Our experts on Constitutional law have decreed that the Second Amendment is the sacred word that guarantees the right of any American to shoot the shit out of anyone and all if he/she feels like it.  The official interpretation of the Second Amendment is fuck justice, fuck domestic tranquillity, fuck the common defense, and fuck, fuck, fuck all that general welfare because it sounds socialist, and fuck other people's liberty.  The Constitutional experts saw that the Founding Fuckers made a huge mistake in the Preamble and put a potential obstacle in the way of people exercising the divine right to kill other people.

If we didn't have  occasions during which people blow away other people,  think how dull life would be.  Well, thanks to the celebrants of our divine right to kill,  out of the last 477 days we had 521 mass shootings to keep the true meaning of America alive.  The shooting over the weekend at Mandalay Bay is said to be the most  successful of all with 59 kills and 520 maims, if you don't include slaughters of black people and Indians, such as at Wounded Knee.  That record won't stand long, because this is America.

The national pride fills our hearts when we get to see a picture of some woman in cowboy boots trying to push some old dude wearing a cowboy hat in a wheel chair out of the line of fire.


Or a couple of chicks lying either dead or scared shitless with a beautiful pattern of blood splatter on the legs of one wearing cut-offs.  Makes one rise up in patriotic pride.  


We can't help but reminisce about some of our finer moments.  Although it had only half the kill-count, we fondly think of Sandy Hook.  What is more American than blasting away a a bunch of public school kids and school teachers?  What a demonstration of our basic values!  We thrill at a line of cowering kids and their teachers trying to lead them to safety, which a good, old AR-15 can blast away with the flick of a trigger finger.

There are some liberal types who threaten our true freedom with the thought that the Preamble to the Constitution means something.  What we need is a day to show that the Second Amendment is the only constitution we need.  Let Congress make the first Tuesday of November  a national holiday when we can have the time off to honor and worship our freedom to see how many people we can terrorize, and see how much we can set new kill-count records every year.  That ought to melt those libby snowflake asses and show them what American values really are.

Sunday, September 24, 2017

Trump is nuts and a danger to the world


This year a panel of psychiatrists broke a professional standard and decided that they had to warn the public that Donald Trump is nuts enough to make him a danger to the country.  Before he was elected,  an Oxford doctor pointed out that Trump scored worse than Hitler on a test for psychopathology.  The Washington Post reviews three books that study the dangers of Trump's insanity:  "Now, some psychiatrists and other mental-health professionals are shedding long-held norms to argue that Trump’s condition presents risks to the nation and the world."

 The major symptom is Trump's obsessive need to destroy other people's accomplishments.  His mode of operation is not to excel at anything he does,  but to dominate by disparaging and destroying anything achieved by others.  His entire campaign was based upon that practice.  The motto   Make America Great Again was based upon the contention that the United States, which had successfully climbed out of The Great Recession had lost its status as strong economy and a bastion pf democracy and freedom.  America had, in fact, retained its leadership until Trump became president, and he led a slump into puny-minded malice and destruction of any claim America has to intellectual leadership and moral competence.

Trump has proven himself to be an inveterate liar.  Little he says is backed up by facts.  For him facts, especially those based on scientific proof,  don't exist.   He uses lies to destroy.  He began his political run by circulating the lie the Obama was not born in America, a lie contrived by racists.  Obama is a a favorite target of his malice.  He extended it when he claimed that Obama wire-tapped Trump Towers,  Even though it has been denied after investigations by his own administration, he repeats it because his only motive is to damage those things that stand in his way or dim the reputations of those who have achieved positive things.  And he sees Obama as an enemy who he would like to take out, if he could. His lies about Obama reveal a man motivated by malice.  They consist of the defamations that are defined as slander and libel.  He practices total dishonesty and malice in violation of the basic decency that our democracy tries to hold as its purpose.  

Trump is the epitome of a vandal.  He is like the child who breaks into someone's house and destroys anything he can find so that other people cannot enjoy their lives.  He is driven by raging resentment.   Where his insane rage is most dangerous is in the effect it has on foreign policy.  His push toward nuclear war with North Korea and Iran is the primitive rage of a petulant child or mental deficient at finding he is not the center of the universe.  People like Trump are usually under custodial care so that they cannot harm themselves or other people.   in Trump's case, his daily rages become headlines in the news along with hurricanes Harvey,  Irma, and Maria, and the Mexico City earthquakes.  That all destroy human lives and parts of the planet.  


Trump's threats against the Iran nuclear agreement define the ignorance and dishonesty that makes up a large part of his character.  As one who represents himself as the world's premier deal-maker,  he has denounced the Iran agreement as horrendous.  Most people who realize the dangers of nuclear weapons in potentially destroying the earth and the living things on it.  So, while the agreement with Iran only delays their development of a nuclear weapon,  it is an achievement which opens up diplomacy as a way of meeting the challenge of nuclear threats.  

But what Trump and the other critics of the deal fail to acknowledge is that the agreement is not just between the U.S. and Iran.  The treaty also includes the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, Germany and the European Union.  The U.S took the lead in negotiating the agreement and succeeded in getting Russia and China to participate in the negotiations and in carrying out the terms of the agreement.  Their inclusion is a amor diplomatic achievement and forms the basis for further nuclear controls.  If Trump were to withdraw from the deal, he would demonstrate to the rest of the world that the U.S. is untrustworthy and incapable of sustaining leadership in addressing the control of armaments.  Iran, as it has threatened, would resume its development of nuclear weapons, and we'd be back to where we were before negotiations.  Trump''s idea is to threaten countries like North Korea and Iran with the very kind of open warfare that the negotiations are intended to avoid.

The Iran nuclear agreement was never claimed to be a solution.  It was created to remove an immediate threat so that more comprehensive negotiations could address the nuclear problem in general.  The Iran agreement was a first step by the big players in the matter of nuclear control.  Trump is vandalizing the one step the world has taken to resume work on the only solution we have for avoiding nuclear war.

He is mentally incapable of engaging in constructive work with the people, congress, or other nations.  But he has the backing and complicity of the Republican Party, and it cannot escape blame for the deterioration of peaceful relationships.  Countries like Russia are always looking for ways to extend power and exercise dominance,  and it has been agreements based upon mutual survival that have kept eat power-hungry in check.  

Trump is a merely a vandal run amok.  And the GOP shares that power obsession and is willing to risk the nation rather than serve it to hold power.  With Trump and the GOP, the leadership we once exercised has been abandoned.  For people who revere the work that the U.S. has pursued for civil rights and the peace to be free,  the U.S. has failed.  Now were have to look to other countries for intellectual and moral leadership.

One of the recent books on Trump's mental state makes the case that the people who have made the Trump craziness possible are the insane ones.  And if one reads the political dialogue on the Internet,  one cannot escape the fact that many people have lost the ability to discern facts and exercise reason.  

The fact is that the nation is divided between those trying to cling to some decency and reason and those who have given up sanity to the lust for totalitarian power.  The rest of the world regards us as dangerous as North Korea.  When we declare allegiance to Trump's flag, we renounce all that America has stood for.  That is insanity.

Monday, September 18, 2017

Regents and the undermining of education

Begin with the fact that South Dakota state government has been defiled by two major scandals involving millions of dollars,  suicides, murder, and the total evasion of responsibility by the people who were in charge and supposed to be exercising oversight of government affairs.  I speak, of course,  of the EB-5 and Gear-Up scandals.  A number of officials and government agencies were involved in those affairs,  but the most troubling aspect is that the state's educational agencies were involved from the inception of those scandals.  When organizations that are responsible for providing the intellectual and character-building resources for young people are involved in nefarious scheming, the probity of the entire state is called into question.

What brings this to mind is a recent story in the local newspaper about the state Democratic Party complaining that the South Dakota government was not following the law in appointing regents.  The law states that of the nine members, no more than six can be members of the same political party. The complaint is that the student regent, who has voting rights on the board, makes seven Republicans on the board.  The regents' attorney says the rule doesn't apply to the student regent.   But that is beside the point.  The point is that regents are appointed on a political basis, and that subjects the universities to political control and agendas.

At one time, the political makeup of the board was incidental to other qualifications,  as it was assumed that the board should be made up primarily of people who had some knowledge of and experience in education.  This changed when Bill Janklow became governor.  He disparaged the Regents' staff by calling them idiots.  However, the Board of Regents seemed to be in turmoil when he took office.  When Carl Opgaard became president of Dakota State shortly before Janklow became governor,  he noted that  "The Board of Regents treated all presidents very shabbily.”  He characterized Janklow as " the sort of governor who wanted to have his hand in everything,  including higher education, despite the legal authority granted the Board of Regents.”

Janklow appointed business people and political cronies to the Regents during his governship, a practice that has continued with his successors.  One of his early appointments was a law school buddy, William Srtska,  who became chair of the BOR, and later a circuit judge. Some manipulations became evident when the Janklow-allied BOR did not inform one member, a former teacher, of meetings.  She resigned.  Janklow  appointed a successor more to his purpose.  However, there has usually been at least one regent on the board identified with education,  but they have never held leadership positions on the board.  In fact, they have rarely been heard from.  Srtska ruled over the Board with an a sledge hammer for a gavel, carrying out the wishes of Janklow,  who made it easy by stacking the BOR with his surrogates.

Janklow did not get along well with university personnel.   Opgaard writes, "Janklow, who took office in 1979, also kept a hand in higher education, and met with considerable opposition from university leaders. At one point, he issued what was termed a "gag order" prohibiting university officials from speaking to the press without permission."  When Janklow came into office,  each president made the case for the funding of their institutions directly with the legislature.  Over time, Janklow placed that task with the Regents, so the presidents made their cases for funding with the BOR, who represented higher education to the legislature.  This arrangement made it more efficient for higher education to operate as a system,  but it displaced the presidents and their staffs as the academic decision-makers for their campuses and put that authority in the hands of the regents.  

Opgaard recalled that as President of DSU, "The most stressful and unrewarding part of the job was working with the South Dakota Board of Regents and the Commissioner of Higher Education."  He said:

 "The Board meddled in internal administrative matters and loved to show their power.  They had to control.  We were unable to change them--I can recall Dick Schleuesner, President of the School of Mines, asserting that we must not blame ourselves because "You can't teach a horse to fly."  We kept the colleges going despite them."
And that has been a truth about the South Dakota Higher Education System since that time.  The colleges delivered education to the students through the work of professors  despite the intrusions of  the Board of Regents.  Over time, the faculty distanced itself from the Board to the point that professors had little idea or interest in what the Board was doing.  And that explains how the EB-5 scandal developed.  

Professors kept a low profile and a distant relationship to the regents for fear that they might attract their intervention and meddling if they were noticed.  The real business of education was carried on as a subversive activity as far as the faculty was concerned.  When the South Dakota BOR conceived the South Dakota International Business Institute  which Joop Bollen was hired to run,  the Regents placed the Institute on the NSU campus, which surprised the faculty because no one knew about anyone from the campus proposing the idea.  Local faculty questioned how the program came about and members of business departments on other campuses raised issues.  One issue was that the curriculum for a degree in international business did not even require a foreign language.  But as the program developed, it was clear that the SDIBI had little to do with the academic mission.  The faculty chose to ignore it as kind of a sacrificial lamb.   If the Regents occupied themselves with the SDIBI, they might leave the academic program to those qualified to run it.

As was made clear during the litigation arising from the EB-5 scandal, Joop Bollen and the SDIBI were not accountable to the university administration.   It had been made clear to the business department chair that Bollen was responsible to the Governor's Office of Economic Development and the department's role was to cooperate, not exercise any academic authority over the program. The Governor's Office, of course, claimed that it assumed Bollen was under Board of Regents supervision.  A whole series of University presidents obediently supported Bollen's operation without question  ( John Hutchinson: 1993-97; John Hilpert (interim 1997-98): 1998-03; Don Cozzetto (interim): 2003-04; Patrick Schloss: 2004-08; Laurie Stenberg Nichols (interim): 2008-09).  Then, in 2009 when President James Smith received notice that NSU needed to cut its budget,  he reviewed the role of the SDIBI and could not reconcile the Institute with the academic mission of the University.  So, he eliminated the SDIBI from the Northern program and evicted it from the campus.  It took up residency in the offices of the Aberdeen Development Corporation and incorporated  under the name South Dakota Regional Center.

The amorphous mess that is the founding of the SDIBI is stated in depositions generated through the litigation:
 
DEPOSITION: John Meyer, Northern State University attorney 
DEPOSITION James Shekleton, Board of Regents General Counsel
DEPOSITION: Joop Bollen, EB5 program director
Harvey Jewett ending 20 years as Regent
From the testimony,  it is clear that the Regents created the SDIBI and imposed it on the campus. Just where it originated is implied strongly in the testimony surrounding the EB-5 scandal.  There is one constant connection that has hovered in the background since Janklow became governor.  That connection is with the Aberdeen law firm Siegal Barnett and Schutz.   A principal in the firm, Joseph  H. Barnett, was a Republican power figure in the state legislature, serving as majority leader and speaker of the house during his 19 years as a member.  Barnett, for whom Northern's physical education center is named, led the effort to provide the new facility for Northern.  He died in office two years before it was completed in 1987.  In June 1988, Janklow appointed the spouse of a law firm member, Cathy Hall, to the Board of Regents.  She was reappointed in March 1993 for a term that was to expire in 1999.  However, she resigned in 1997, and Janklow appointed law firm member Harvey Jewett to succeed her.  Jewett retired from the Board this year.

The building of a physical education center was important for the development of Northern as a four-year institution.  Its sister institutions, in competition for funding and status, often recommended that it be made a junior college.  Janklow closed a state campus in Springfield and turned it into a prison,  and he had plans for Dakota State which he turned into a computer-centered school.  The rivalries of state institutions of higher education in South Dakota have been detrimental to its higher education system  as some faculty and administrators engaged in petty treacheries which invited meddling by the regents and governor.  Northern shared the civic center arena with the high school for its  basketball games, and scheduling was difficult.  The building of the Barnett Center was a boost for Northern, not only in terms of providing an essential physical education and sports center, but in providing a community and regional facility that is extensively used by people in the area.  It consistently ranks high nationally for the number of people who attend its athletic events.  

Reservations about the building came under discussion during some faculty development sessions with visiting academic leaders, however. Some of the more astute Northern faculty and the visiting experts discussed a problem that the naming of the Barnett Center  indicates.  The building was not named for professors and coaches who built the programs of the school, but for a politician whose support, although needed and appreciated, did not necessarily contribute to strengthening the academic stature of the college.  As the professors noted, universities are often the places where political figures like to build monuments to their power.  When Joe Barnett arranged for the building of the physical education center,  he and the college administration understood that a tacit quid pro quo was involved.  Not only would his name be memorialized in the building,  but he and his surrogates would would have an executive voice in the running of the university.  So, a member of Siegal, Barnett, and Schutz has sat on the Board of Regents and overseeing the affairs of Northern State  University from the mid-1980s until this June, when  Harvey Jewett retired.

NSU held a retirement reception for Jewett at the Johnson Fine Arts Center, when it was revealed that the main theater in the Center will be renamed the Harvey and Cynthia Jewett Theater.  With the help of some multi-million dollar bequeathals to Northern,  it is making significant additions to its physical campus under the regental guardianship of Jewett.  Construction on a new science building will begin in the spring.  Jewett received credit for pushing this addition through the Regents and the legislature in the face of resistance by some in the higher education community.  In addition to many improvements made to campus facilities, Northern opened a new dorm this fall with more scheduled for construction.   

Northern does have an attractive campus, although as I pass by it (I live two blocks away) I seldom see people occupying it.  It used to be thronged between class hours.  And sometimes I was assigned class space that was far from ideal, but like most of my colleagues, we concentrated on covering the subject matter, not the atmospherics of our settings.  Northern provided opportunities for students with no money.  Over the years,  I had many students who worked  less-than-mininum wage jobs in town-- lousy jobs which motivated them to get degrees and move on.  Some employers would call students into work when they had classes or even exams.  Most of us accommodated these students when their bosses made such demands on them.  At one time, Northern called itself "a gateway institution," conveying that it provided a chance to move on to a better life.  Some regents and legislators objected to the slogan because it advertised the objective of getting out of South Dakota.  The fact was that Northern had earned a reputation for providing competitive educations which enabled students to build better lives in places that offered them better opportunities.  The faculty was happy to assist in that mission.

Better facilities, however, raise the overhead that is covered by tuition and fees.  Still affordable in comparison with many schools,  Northern is expensive beyond what a part-time job can cover.  Costs for instate students and those from North Dakota and Iowa are estimated at:  


Tuition
$7,191
Fees
$1,089
Room
$3,640
Meal Plan
$3,650
Books/Supplies
$1,200


A person living off campus at home will need to come up with about $9500 to cover a year.    (At the private college where  I previously taught tuition and fees are estimated at $40,908 for a year. ) That is why students who obtain degrees face a crushing debt load at graduation from student loans.  It is no longer possible to work your way through college.

The reason behind the escalating expense of going to college can be glimpsed in a statement made by the man chosen to replace Harvey Jewett on the Board of Regents:

"Our universities are like a business.  We have to compete with all other universities all over the country, so we have to be affordable and competitive.  My philosophy is, if you expect a return, you have to invest. We need to make sure we're investing in our universities so that we've got the facilities that can compete and will attract these young kids to campus."
That old, wrong-headed cliche about running a college like a business is the plague of education.  Colleges and businesses have totally different purposes.  Colleges are to train critical, knowledgeable minds; businesses are to make money.  Both have to adhere to the  realities of budgets.   But the allocation of education funds on a business model limits the accessibility of higher education to those who can afford it and closes off education as a means to improving life.  Higher education in America has become the most expensive in the world and it is a vehicle for inequality.  While it is nice to upgrade campus facilities and particularly to keep abreast of educational technology,  the emphasis on the physical campus eclipses the function of higher education to deliver an advancing curriculum.

At NSU, while the university has made gains in campus facilities, its offerings in the liberal arts have been pared away.  As I look over the course schedules for the department I once worked in, English, I find a bare-bones offering of classes.   Northern is not competing with other institutions in terms of curriculum and diversity of opportunities to explore developments in knowledge.  

One may ask how a scheme such as the EB-5 scam came to be a part of a university,  and the answer is that someone who saw a university as a business could see no reason not to make it a business.  And that someone had more authority than the professional educators.  When Mike Rounds claimed that the EB-5 business was in the hands of the Regents,  he spoke the truth.  However, he had endorsed the scheme.    

When a state's educational agencies become the incubators for financial scams,  the entire state is suspect. 





Monday, August 21, 2017

"Please let them disappear in their stench."

Ii isn't nice to make fun of the intellectually disadvantaged.  But sometimes they make us laugh,  just as children can make us laugh when they try out adult-like thought and expression .  The laughter is often at ourselves, because when children imitate adult behavior they often offer illuminating parodies of it.  However, the clumsy and inept use of language can be side-splittingly funny.  College professors often share ridiculous student papers with each other for the much-needed laughter they provide.

The following letter-to-the-editor supplied one of those occasions of hilarity.  I no longer can run down the office hallway to share a moment of humor with colleagues, so  I share it here. The last sentence of the first paragraph could win a Pulitzer if there was a category for T-shirt mottoes.  Here is the letter:
Just a short, easy-to-read letter from and to Americans. The recent gossip about impeaching our president of the United States is careless gossip from a few incompetent residents of this great nation. Please let them disappear in their stench.
The best of our knowledge, as American citizens, taxpayers, and regular voters: We the voters of this nation elected Donald Trump as our president. We are thankful for his participation in the leadership of the United States of America. We want him to be able to concentrate on the work of our nation and not have his time wasted by the shallow-headed Americans who cause trouble for our elected president, Mr. Donald Trump. Let's be intelligent enough to support him and the leadership he provides for this nation.  
We are faithful citizens of this nation and we are pleased to have a president who, as an American businessperson, was very successful. We support him and we are delighted as citizens and taxpayers to have a competent person at our nation’s leadership, and we want to be rid of forever the sneaky, incompetent and dishonest Obama crowd.
Just citizens of USA.
Arlee and Lyle Berg
Webster

Thursday, August 17, 2017

Trump is the creature of his party

The military led the desegregation of the United States.  Civil rights leader A. Philip Randolph pressured President Harry Truman to sign a desegregation order for the military. He pointed out that black men would boycott the draft if they weren’t treated equally with whites in the military service.  Black men who had served in World War II in support roles—not allowed in combat— returned home to a segregated society that treated them with abusive discrimination like the fascist society they had been told they were serving their country to prevent.  People like Randolph saw the trouble looming with men who realized they were, in fact, serving white supremacy.  On July 14, 1948,  Pres. Truman signed order 9981 to desegregate the military.

The order was implemented and carried out largely during the administration of Dwight Eisenhower (1953-1961),  who had dealt with the segregated military as the Supreme Commander of Allied Forces during World War II.   During the Battle of the Bulge,  Eisenhower was running out of combat troops,  so he issued an order to transfer some black support troops into combat roles,  much to the consternation and opposition of some of his generals.  The major events in the desegregation process of the U.S. were set in motion during the Eisenhower administration.

I served in Germany with Eisenhower as Commander in Chief eight years after the desegregation order was signed.  Officially, the Army was desegregated.  Socially, segregation lingered on.  Blacks, whites, and Latinos tended to stick with people of their own color.   Racial and ethnic attitudes were barriers that an executive order could not breach.  Some of us were assigned to provide the Friday Troop Information and Education Sessions, and we were told that  racial prejudice was the designated enemy we were to help defeat.  

We  troops were sent to Germany as part of the Cold War.  We put up missile batteries to protect against any incursions from the Soviet Union.  But our real battle was against de facto segregation and racial violence.  Some Air Force personnel we encountered bragged about having caught a black man in a barracks stairwell and throwing him down it.  On my base, my bunk mate was black.  One night in the enlisted men’s club, some men got belligerent about me being a “nigger lover” and wanted to teach me a lesson.  Word got back to the orderly room and the officer of the day dispatched the guard mount to empty the club and escort everyone back to the barracks.  The segregation battle was actually our major concern.  The Army Brass wanted us to demonstrate equality as a way of convincing the German people that democracy was the way of life they should adopt.  But the fact of the time was that back at home in the U.S., Jim Crow still ruled, even if the military was taking measures against it internally.  

The resurgence of racism is not surprising.   It is like chicken pox virus which, once it infects one,  can lie dormant and then re-emerge as shingles, an affliction of misery.  When we elected Obama as president,  many thought we had achieved a state of racial equality.  But having a black man as president activated the virus of hate and it soon surged through society.  John Boehner and Mitch McConnell openly exhibited race-based opposition to Obama.  Their actions were not matters of mere political difference but were characterized by the need to insult and demean the black president.  Boehner refused phone calls from the president in ways that made sure they were demeaning slights that told the black president he did not deserve  respectful considerations. McConnell announced that his major purpose was not to legislate for the benefit of the people, but his sole purpose would be devoted to  denying Obama a second term.   The intensity and belligerence of McConnell’s campaign against Obama revealed a loathing that went much deeper than politics.  The insane reaction to the Affordable Care Act, as it carried over into the Trump administration, showed that McConnell and his cohorts were far more interested in exercising the power to put Obama in his place than they were in accomplishing anything for the benefit of the American people.  


Trump is the epitome of stupid depravity.  His words in defense of demonstrations of white supremacy and  Nazi racism are refutations of America’s long struggle to achieve equality for all people.  But he has the help and protection of the party that put him in office and supports his destruction of liberty, equality, and justice.     He wishes to undo what the military led the way for America to accomplish.  

Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
Aberdeen, South Dakota, United States

NVBBETA