Guns and poses
I grew up with guns. My dad had a Winchester Model 97 12 gauge broken down in its canvas and leather case in the basement. I spent most of my summers with my mother who cared for her mother who lived on a farm with two bachelor sons. A short distance from the kitchen door was a 3-unit building. One unit housed the cream separator. The middle unit was where the stoves that heated the dining room and living room were stored during the warm months of the year. The third unit was the wash house. It contained a stove for heating water, a washing machine, and a large galvanized tub for bathing. That unit was closest to the kitchen door.
High on the wall of the bath house was a shelf that held boxes of shotgun shells and rifle ammunition, and above it was a rack that held a 12 gauge Winchester pump and a .22 Mossberg bolt action. Bathing was done in the aroma of laundry soap and gunpowder. The bath house was closest to the barnyard gate so that if you heard a skunk or coon raiding the chickens or a fox taking a baby pig, you could quickly grab your weapon of choice on your way to dispatch the critter. Such actions happened fairly often.
Guns were regarded as just tools, like saws and hammers and fence wire cutters. You kept them clean and oiled and unloaded. You used them to maintain the farm, which included an occasional hunt for what we now call game. Hunting was not an outdoor sport by the people around me then. It was part of providing food. That included the elimination of predators of the food animals.
When I was a child in Illinois, deer had been eliminated from the land by over-hunting and lack of habitat. Hunting was therefore limited to small animals, rabbits, squirrels, and wild fowl. It was a matter of providing food and some variety in the diet. Many farms then had hedge fences. Those fences were great habitat for game animals. Game animals were part of the food production. Although they were not referred to as game. The rabbbits, the quail, and an occasional pheasant stretched the food budget. They were not the objects of a sport. The people around me regarded those who hunted for the purpose of killing as perverted and demented. Trophy hunting was aberrant. People who had mounted animal heads on their walls or preserved pheasants on their shelves were regarded with ridicule and disdain.
When I was 12, I got a Springfield .410 for Christmas from my brother. Thus, I became a gun owner with the capability of contributing to the food supply. And I became responsible for a gun.
My next ownership came years later when working in the sports department of a newspaper. I joined a group that in the closing days of summer would register to build duck blinds in the chutes and sloughs of the Mississippi River. I bought a used Winchester Model 12 for the duck season. Men from the group would get up before sunrise and boat to the blinds, and often get our limits shortly after the sun came up on the days there were ducks to be had. Duck hunting was almost a religious ritual in terms of the preparation and rules for the hunt. We took the ducks to our homes to clean for our freezers and stoves. However, one of our members owned a riverside restaurant that featured game on its menu. At the end of duck season, he would prepare a banquet for the families of the hunters with some of our harvest to celebrate the season. He had a recipe for roasting wild duck that was renowned throughout the region. The occasion was a duck thanksgiving.
During our hunts some of the men took thermos bottles of steaming coffee which they would lace with brandy. After sitting in a duck blind on a cold river and retrieving ducks from the frigid waters, the enhanced coffee was a welcome way to warm up stiff and cold bodies. One morning as we were walking back to where our cars were parked, a 16-year-old son of one of the hunters seemed to have gotten into the coffee. He was careless in the way he was handling his gun so that the muzzle was pointing every which way. One of the men said, "Be careful where you're pointing that gun." The kid stopped, pointed his gun in the man's general direction, and said, "No one tells me what to do." In an instant, three men were holding their guns on the kid. Even the retrieving dogs were on alert. The boys father walked up, said, "I'd better take charge of that," and took the shotgun away from the boy.
Our duck thanksgiving was kind of a doleful affair that year. It was clear to us that our group was disbanding. That incident with the boy had made us question the ritual of the hunt in our day and age.
M2 carbine |
5 comments:
I have a S&W revolver I received from my father, who got it from his father, with the understanding that it never be fired and passed on to the next generation. I am uncertain if ammunition is even obtainable for this vintage weapon. I've not fired a rifle since I qualified, despite being a horrible shot, at Fort Leonard Wood in 1962.
Great article David. It brought back many memories of my own interactions with guns, and similar lessons from my grandfather. A gun was just another dangerous tool to be handled carefully and used only to accomplish some necessary task.
I disagree, however, with your analysis of the Rittenhouse case. As best I can tell that case creates no new legal rule permitting some bozo to carry a gun into a crowd and then kill someone trying to disarm him if he poses a danger, any more than the OJ Simpson verdict meant someone could kill his wife and her lover with impunity. Instead, despite all the publicity and commentary, the case is simply one jury's verdict in one case based on their conclusion, right or wrong, that the prosecutor failed to prove the elements of the charged crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. The next guy who kills someone in similar circumstances could just as likely be convicted on all counts and sentenced to life in prison, or execution in some states, depending on the particular attitudes of the jurors, the skill exhibited by both the prosecutor and defense counsel, and the manner and nature of the judge rulings and behavior.
I also hope that justice In the future will hold people fully responsible for their acts. The Rittenhouse case does not set a legal precedent, but it reflects a prevailing attitude.
I enjoyed your article but when I grew up in the 60's with a brother using me for target practice with his BB gun, it was not enjoyable. I developed a hatred for guns at age 6.
Guns are not toys for little boys to PLAY with.
I have received inquiries about how the restaurant chef prepared the ducks for a banquet. His recipe was an adaptation of Peking Duck, as I recall. His restaurant featured game on the menu, and he had developed a menu that attracted people from throughout the Midwest.
Post a Comment