How to kill civilians and their families and revel in glory, or whatever
The downing of Malaysian flight 17 puzzled me. That is because I am an old surface-to-air missile crewman for the first anti-aircraft missile deployed by the U.S. to protect its borders and those of NATO allies, the Nike Ajax.
What
puzzles me is the information, particularly coming from Russia and its agents in Ukraine, seems
so ridiculous that I wonder why the news media has not delved into the facts
about missiles, how they operate, and what they can do.
Somewhere
in my files is a small ring-binder that we crewmen carried in the breast pocket
of our fatigues that contained the information given us during our
training. It was classified as secret
and we had a notation mandated on the first page that the information was for
the use and dissemination of crewmen only.
Much of that information is available on the Internet so I think I can
disseminate.
The
development of the Nike Ajax started in the late 1940s. By the early 1950s it was widely deployed in
the U.S.
and deployment continued throughout the
world during the 1950s. My unit, Overseas
Package 5, was sent to Germany
in 1957 to convert an anti-aircraft gun battery to a missile battery deployed
in remote parts of, then, West
Germany.
Here
are the characteristics of the Nike Ajax that have to be compared what is said
about the downing of MH17.
- It was 18 feet long with a two-stage system propelled by a booster rocket and a sustaining engine.
- It traveled at 2.3 times the speed of sound, breaking the sound barrier as it left the launcher.
- It could reach 70,000 feet.
- It was guided by ground radar, a tracking radar and an analog computer which tracked the target and guided the missile into it.
- Its pattern of attack was to ascend to an altitude above the target, execute a high altitude turn back down to the target, and approach the target from above—it is very difficult for a target to evade a missile approaching it from above.
- It did not have to make a direct hit on the target; its 3 warheads, which weighed 1455 pounds (the missile itself weighed 1000 pounds) could destroy a target by proximity.
- The radar system contained a Friend or Foe indicator which could identify friendly, commercial, and non-combative aircraft and track only hostile aircraft as potential targets.
- The firing procedure included a series of steps to verify the status of the target and to prevent any targeting of innocent, non-combative aircraft.
Sixty-some
years after the deployment of this missile system, the downing of MH17 is
incomprehensible. The photographs of
wreckage are pretty conclusive evidence that missile shrapnel shredded the
aircraft. and its pattern of descent fits that of missile-hit aircraft. The accounts of the drunken Russian
separatist militia, the mindless statements of its leaders, and Putin’s
assurances that he is advising restraint to the Russian separatists, while
Russian ordnance continues to pour into the regions they hold, indicate the
downing of MH17 was no accident.
The
real puzzler is why the press is so timid about putting the claims of Russia
and its separatists in the context of facts as they are verified and established. When things are said, the first task of the
press is—or, at least, it used to be—to check them for veracity, verify the
facts in terms of the circumstances they allude to, and present the
confirmations or the discrepancy to the public in clear terms.
We
are living in a time when atrocities are being committed under the rules of
jihad and now in Ukraine and Gaza with a political
aggression that rivals Europe of the 1930s.
The
dismaying aspect is that there seems to be few people in the world who
understand the difference between the fact and propaganda that led to World War II
and the Cold War that followed. If blogs
claim to be superior to the legacy media in presenting uncomfortable facts. Maybe its time they dropped the snark and
mindless bickering and start concentrating on facts.
2 comments:
Hello David, Lynn from Madville.
Could it be that these news organizations are so afraid to lose access or fear for their safety that they compromise their aggressiveness for the truth? A CNN reporter was kidnapped in Eastern Ukraine yet another kidnapping by these thugs.
The European economies are so intertwined with Russia. Could that be another reason the press response is weak? Look at the Dutch and how many citizens they lost and their bodies were treated and valuables stolen yet the response just isn't as high as one would expect.
Russia is like one big mafia state.
The current media foolish consistency is thinking balanced news requires giving the same respect and coverage to both reality and complete nonsense, mythology, lies or fraud. Your post suggests the wisdom of using the same kind of careful analysis for all sides rather than the current of hobgoblin of small press minds tethered like suckling calves to advertisers and interests.
Post a Comment