On real fake news

The newspaper I worked for hired a journalistic "hero," who had served a month in jail in Colorado for refusing to reveal a news source.  She had written about judicial corruption in Colorado and a judge sent her to jail when she wouldn't say who gave her the information or how she got it.  Her stance earned her national recognition and she was featured on the cover of Life magazine. 

She came to the Quad-Cities area to work for a newspaper in Davenport, Iowa.  After a short time, she left that paper-- at its request-- and came across the river to work on the Moline, Illinois, paper where I worked.  She was features editor and covered higher education.  That's where some problems with her showed up.

In her reporting, she showed a personal dislike for the president of the local community college.  Her reports implied that his staff members resented him and questioned his competence.  I knew a number of the faculty, and they said her contention was simply not true.  That circumstance was something that greatly perturbed other journalists on the newspaper staff.  She made things up but claimed they were the results of her investigations.  The editor was reluctant to restrain her because her stories sold newspapers; she was well regarded by many readers.  However, the area had a press club, and two of its members documented the falsehoods she made and wrote about them in the organization's newsletter.  Their purpose was to disassociate honest working journalists from a person who they thought did not meet the ethical and professional standards of a true journalist.  The same attitude prevailed at the newspaper I worked for.  The matter came to a head one day.

She ran a story that purported that illegal gambling activities were taking place throughout the countryside.  She included a photograph of a line of cars parked on the side of a country lane leading to a farmstead where she said men gathered to play high-stakes poker and craps.  I recognized the scene portrayed, as I was there.  The event was actually a workshop on grooming and handling cattle for show conducted by University of Illinois extension specialists for 4-H and Future Farmer members.  I covered the workshop on the farm page, but many readers read and believed the woman's story that gambling  was taking place there.  The owners of the farm requested that a retraction and correction be printed, but the reporter claimed that her story was true and that gamblers used the workshop contention to cover their gambling activities. 

The owners of the farm were prominent community leaders and had their lawyer call the editor to inform him that they intended to enter a defamation suit if the story was not corrected.  The editor came to the realization that the "investigative reporting" by the woman was largely made up.  He enforced a rule that she had to identify her sources either in her stories or at least to him so that he could verify the information.  The reporter rebuked the editor, saying that he was trying to gain access to news sources that she had developed.  Tension between the editor and her got intense, and was aggravated by the fact that her work was often slovenly.  The managing editor complained about the quality of her work, which detracted from the professional work produced by other staff members. Her work degraded the reputation of the newspaper, which was considered one of the most influential news sources in downstate Illinois.  Her effect on the newspaper was so discouraging that I decided it was time to change jobs.  I did not find any attractive openings in the news business.  That and the passage of a peacetime GI Bill resulted in the decision to go to graduate school.  However, I was just one of seven editorial staff members to leave the paper at that time.  Another factor was that the owners--the editor and the publisher--had decided to sell the paper, and none of the prospective buyers sponsored the kind of publications than hardcore journalists wanted to work for.  So, we left.

Many newspapers were not beacons of journalistic light.  Their editorial policies were shaped more to please the advertisers and serve the social and political interests of community leaders than to provide reliable factual information to a readership engaged in a democracy.  The journalists at the Moline paper thought that the made-up stories of that "star" journalist were a serious betrayal of the trust that serious journalists try to create in their readers.  Her work was fake news, because it was made up.  Trump applies the term to any news that displeases him, although it is usually carefully reported and factually accurate.

The internet has shattered the community news business.   Aberdeen, for example, does not have a full-fledged news organization operating in the community anymore.  When I moved here, there was a newspaper, two television news departments, and three radio stations with staffs reporting the local news.  All of that is gone.  Now there are only partial efforts at coverage by internet sources.  The economics of the news business has been destroyed and journalists have not found a way to re-establish thorough and consistent coverage.  Bad writing and false stories fill the internet pages.  Major news organizations are easily available on the internet, but local news reporting is sporadic at best.  Serious efforts get mixed in with the fakes, and readers are bewildered by trying to distinguish the real from the fake.

Real journalists need to organize and clarify their efforts so that readers and watchers know who they can depend on for real news.

 

The proctology caucus and the end of America

The matter of Donald Trump is not one of partisan politics.  It is a matter of what comprises decency.  A colleague calls the MAGA cult the proctology caucus because it is so enamored of an asshole.  He points out that these people will be around after Trump is gone and that their admiration of Trump raises questions about whether the United States can sustain an honorable, uncorrupted government.  To endorse Trump is to reject democracy.

Trump posts statements on the social media that are so crudely malevolent that they are characteristic of an emotionally disturbed, mentally deficient fifth-grader,  certainly not of a functioning adult.  And that brings up the divided state of our country.  The politicians talk of unifying.  That talk ignores the fact that people of some intelligence and decency do not want to be allied with people who lack and disparage those qualities. People who revere those qualities are aware that democracy works only when it is applied with scruples in regard to the rights and aspirations of others.

The election of Donald Trump marked a failure of American democracy.  Although we claim to be a democracy, about half of our citizens think that leadership has to be authoritarian.  They are used to obeying teachers, bosses, ministers, spouses, police, whatever form authority figures can come in.  The founders of our republic were clear about designing a system of governance that would not permit a king or anything resembling one to be in charge.  Still, there are people who are enthralled by royalty and its privileges. Walt Whitman recognized the problem when he said the democratic United States 'are destined either to surmount the gorgeous history of feudalism, or else prove the most tremendous failure of time."  The election of Trump, the heir millionaire with a predatory criminal history, was a step backward into the iniquities of feudalism.  When Trump speaks of making America great again, he is speaking of its vagaries of the past which democracy works to overcome.

Trump is a despicable person who flouts the principles that the republic was formed to develop and protect.  He is an asshole who embodies the values of many Americans, and those are not the values of a functioning democracy.  They are the values of pageantry and power that are rooted in feudalism.

A vote for Trump is a vote to stop the quest for liberty, equlality, and justice.  We borrowed a term from the black American vernacular, woke, to describe people who are extremely sensitive to the inequities, and injustices of the world, and have made it a term of derision and contempt.   That is how close we have come to losing our democracy.

Trump is an asshole, but he has a lot of fellows who admire that quality in a man.  But the biggest problem is how do you unify with people who do not, in fact, want the qualities of life that America was created to develop and preserve?

That is what is at issue in the upcoming election.

 

Gaslighting an entire nation

 The Republican Convention was an exercise in mass gaslighting.  Its premise was that anything negative in Trump's past was a malevolent contrivance of the Democrats.  The speakers at the Tuesday night session of the convention sounded as if they were nominating him for sainthood.  And there were shots of him with his bandaged ear as evidence of the mockery and abuse he suffered in his quest to redeem the nation from its diminished plight.

The Trump slogan [Make America Great Again] has always puzzled me.  When was it that America was so notably great?   What characterized its greatness?  When and how did it lose those characteristics?  Just what characteristics will restore its greatness?  Or has it always been what it is?

The whole MAGA business is a baseless contention.  There are no facts that stand up under scrutiny that define the greatness.  Some of the momentum of the civil rights movement has declined, but the MAGA people are behind that setback.  The right wing is in a frantic frenzy to destroy the diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts (DEI) to extend the civil rights principles into matters of employment and everyday life.  It has had some success in that regard.

The United States from its inception has strived to meet in practice the words of its founding, to achieve liberty, equality, and justice for all.  But there has always been a significant portion of the population that has no real interest in those qualities.The current push for equity has involved more women getting into positions of authority usually held by men.  I have not witnessed that process from the inside because the jobs I have held were in places where women were already in leadership positions--in journalism and education.  I do understand, however, that men dominated the executive suites in the nation. And that includes the White House.  That may soon change, as we've seen women become contenders for the presidency. Women are now the  top officers in some corporations, and that fact marks an achievement in behalf of  gender equality.  It doesn't, however, signify an advance in social equality, as corporate officers cling to authoritarian roles in their exercise of executive function, no matter what their gender.

During what we refer to as the civil rights era, we made important strides toward addressing racial and social discrimination.  Those gains were apparent at the Democratic Convention with the number of prominent black people participating and the nominee for president being a multi-racial woman.  Much of their efforts were to refute the MAGA efforts to return to a past that was short on human rights and catered to the privileges  of a wealthy few and excluded others on a racial and social basis.  The rallying cry of the Democrats is "We won't go back!"

The irony is that the GOP, under the marshaling of Sen. Everett Dirksen (R-Illinois) exerted leadership in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 over the obstruction of a block of Democratic senators.  The MAGA folks think greatness was a time when a select few had power and privilege over ordinary Americans.  The current Democrats are defining just what Trump and his ilk mean by "greatness."  America's greatness is in its arduous efforts to achieve equality and attain liberty and justice for all.  Trump represents a setback in the progress we've made.  And a number of Republicans who worked for him and spoke at the Democratic Convention explained that.  

Trump speaks of America's failures as a nation, but he is its most significant one.  

The flag of a failed democracy.

  

What does the banishment of Woke, DEI, and the like really mean?

First, it means that the mean, petty, and stupid have triumphed.  And that the rest of the population isn't literate enough to understand that.  Secondly, it means our education system has failed to instill even the rudiments of literacy as a goal of education. 

When terms such as woke and DEI are constantly used, the attitudes they provoke displace their meaning.  For example, the term woke came from black communities to designate the awareness of  racial prejudice and discrimination experienced by people of color in a white-dominated society.  People who harbored discriminatory attitudes in their minds used the term derisively to belittle people who claimed an awareness of racial discrimination.  It became a term of disparagement, an insult.  So, no one wanted to be insulted by being called woke.  Those who advocate or tolerate racial belittlement found they could advance their cause by applying the term woke in a disparaging manner, and such application of the term made racial prejudice seem like an acceptable, superior practice.  

One of the hypocrisies of American life is that we proudly recite that all people are created equal but have an obsessive need to assert superiority over others.  Most people resent being said to be equal with people they regard as inferior.  America's most serious failures as a democracy are rooted in that resentment, and that resentment is driving a retreat in the quest for equality.  America's right wing is successfully blocking equality  as a condition of American life. 

A corporation headquartered in my hometown, Moline, Ill., John Deere, issued a statement that it is abandoning DEI policies in favor of quality-based policies.  At the same time, it issued a statement that it was laying off more than 600 employees.  "Cut the DEI policies, Orville, and it's our chance to get the niggers, spics, and chinks out of here!"  Oh, and the company is moving some production to Mexico. The obvious implication is that the company thinks that employment practices that try to include people of diverse backgrounds interferes with the quality of work done.  Lower the diversity of the work force and you raise the quality of the work.  But then you send the work down to the country where some of these diverse people come from.  Along with abandoning diversity, equality, and inclusion in hiring policies, the company seems to also have abandon coherence in decision-making.  We live in the age of Trump, which has taught us that business CEOs find democracy a bit of a nuisance.

One thing we learn in this situation is that it is foolish to look for the qualities of a functional democracy in the way business is done.  Those qualities are detrimental to business.  Well, at least to business leaders who call themselves conservative.  We tend to forget that slavery was a profitable enterprise, and it was that damned  notion of equality that ruined that enterprise.

On shooting the pooch

Gov. Noem has published an account of shooting her dog Cricket because he, among other things, enjoyed chicken dinners, but did not obtain them from Col. Sanders.  He got them from neighboring farms in their live state and processed them himself.  When it came to chicken coops, Cricket was foxy.  But Gov. Noem chose, rather than train and restrain her errant mutt, to take him out to a gravel pit where she served the role of executioner. She shot him, and bragged about it in the book she wrote.  While she was at it, she also shot a goat that apparently displeased her. 

Her explanations claimed her shootings were a matter of protecting her family and public safety.  However, her actions were widely condemned by people in both political parties.  When it comes to killing a family pet, there is much consternation among the public.

I recall one occasion in my family when an uncle shot the family dog.  I was staying on their farm with my cousins  when we children were summoned to come in the house.  They had a dog named Lucky.  We were told that Lucky's luck had run out, and he was showing the symptoms of rabies.  We were to stay in the house until my uncle and the hired man resolved the situation,  Their first effort was to try to catch Lucky and take him to the veterinarian, but the vet said if the dog was showing signs of aggressive behavior, there was nothing he could do to help the dog, as the disease had progressed beyond the point at which there was any treatment available.  The dog was shot and wrapped in a tarpaulin.  Then everybody was equipped with buckets or pressure  sprayers and we disinfected the places the dog had been during his last moments of life.  The dog's body was hauled to a vet's laboratory where it was confirmed that the dog had rabies and then incinerated.  Lucky had been a constant companion with my cousins, and they never had another dog again.  The loss of Lucky was too painful for them, and they didn't want to hazard such a loss again.

My family had a dog for years.  They got her when my brother was two, so Fluffy was two years older than me.  She was a mixed breed that included Chow and some shepherd breed.  She helped raise me.  When I was an infant, my mother would put me in a baby buggy in the back yard to get some fresh air, and Fluffy would lie under the buggy to guard it.  When I became old enough to  toddle around,  Fluffy, much to my annoyance, would herd me away from the busy street that ran past our front yard.  She was my guardian.  I think of her in this context because of the way she ended her life.

On a brisk autumn day when I was 14, I was playing  catch with some friends using a baseball size rubber ball.  Fluffy was with me, and would retrieve the ball when we failed to catch it.   Then we had to catch Fluffy to get the ball back.  We had much fun with Fluffy as our play became a game of keep-away from her.  She was 16, and playing like a puppy. Our game ended as supper time approached and we went to our homes.  After supper, we realized Fluffy was not home, and we called for her, but she didn't show up. We weren't too concerned because she was part of the neighborhood and some neighbors would let her in their houses to be petted.  At bed time she hadn't returned, but we had an enclosed back porch where we put food and water for her.  We were confident that she was visiting a neighbor and could eventually seek the shelter of the porch and the warmth of an old rag rug we keep there for her.  Her regular bed was in the basement next to the furnace.

The next morning, my mother got a telephone call from a neighbor across the street,  The woman said they found Fluffy on their front porch and she didn't seem able to get to her feet.  I carried her home, and we put her in the car and headed to the vet.  We were puzzled that she could have shown so much life the day before, but seemed so ill.  The vet explained that her age was a factor.  She went to the neighbor's porch to rest but was further stressed by the cold night coming on, and it triggered many problems of canine old age, including arthritis, failing kidneys, and other internal malfunctions.  He said he could keep her at the animal hospital and treat her as much as was possible to see if she recovered, but she was so old and fragile that she might need to be put down to spare further suffering.  She didn't improve and showed signs of pain, so we ended up at the vet clinic to say our goodbyes to Fluffy, and she was put quietly to sleep.

Then there was Seth.  My grandmother lived on a farm with two bachelor uncles.  Seth was mostly German Shepherd, and was unusually intelligent.  When my uncles needed to go in and out of fields containing livestock,  they would say, "Seth, watch the gate," and he would position himself by the open gate and keep the livestock in until my uncles closed it.  This might be for hours.  

Seth also was a  helpmate for my grandmother, who suffered from rheumatism. The farm at that time did not have water running to the house.  The well was located outside the fenced-in yard.  When my grandmother open the  storm door to go get water, a door-closer which held the door tightly shut made a snapping sound, at which Seth would come running.  He would open the fence gate for my grandmother as she passed through it.  He was the master gate keeper on the farm.

His death was brutal.  The neighborhood thrashing gang was on the farm harvesting oats.  There were five teams of horses hauling oat bundles in from the field to the thrashing machine, and they were lined up to be unloaded into the machine.  One team was composed of a pair of broncos, and Seth was lying in the shade of the wagon they were pulling as the men pitched the oat bundles into the thrasher.  Something spooked them and they suddenly bolted.  The men were sent sprawling, and the rear wagon wheel ran over Seth.  He yelped, ran to the house, and sought refuge under the porch, where he died of internal injuries.  My uncles never replaced him, and my grandmother came to my parents' house in town to live.  She often talked about how much she missed Seth.

There can be another side to farm dogs.  While I was farm editor for a newspaper, there was a rash of sheep killings in one of the rural neighborhoods.  Farmers speculated about wolves, coyotes, and cougars,  all of which were very rare in that part of the country.  One morning I received a call from the county conservation officer, who was a distant relative,  that there had been a mass killing of sheep.  A photographer and I went to the scene.  Because of prior killings, there were many experts in the area looking into them.    In this case, about 80 sheep were killed.  A large group of investigators were already on the scene when we got there--the sheriff's department, game conservation officers, wildlife biologists, veterinarians, and agricultural officials.

They determined that dogs in the area were forming packs at night and going feral.  They found witnesses who had seen the packs and after inspecting some suspected dogs found evidence that they were the culprits.   One dog in particular was the instigator and leader of the pack.  The farmer who owned the sheep filed a law suit and the lawyers worked  out a settlement in private, so we had scant information about how the matter was resolved.  However, the incident was reported throughout the nation, and legislatures passed and revised laws on the predation of domestic animals by dogs that have gone feral.  South Dakota law makes it legal to shoot a predatory dog.

So, Kristi Noem was within the law.  But she was far outside the propriety expected of a government leader.  The question:  Is someone who goes around shooting dogs and goats capable of running a democratic state?  No one has ever accused Kristi Noem of being overburdened with intellect.  But the fact that she was elected governor falls on the people who elected her governor.  The contention that South Dakota comes up a bit short in the intellect department is grounded in demonstrable fact.  South Dakota got that reputation the old-fashioned way.  It earned it.  And Kristi is its emblem.

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/5371904020164697258/9212326594720648877

 

 

 

 

24 former Trump associates who denounce him

 Many people think that if Americans voted Donald Trump into the office of president again, it would effectively be a vote to end the democracy.  Some think that he doesn't know the difference of presiding over a corporation in which he is a dictator and presiding over a democracy of free people.  Others regard him as a bumbling fool.  He has a long list of bumbles and mendacious episodes.  He has accrued a long list of associates  who denounce him as candidate for president.  CNN has created a list of 24 associates who disapprove of him along with their reasons.  The list follows:

1. His vice president, Mike Pence: “The American people deserve to know that President Trump asked me to put him over my oath to the Constitution. … Anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be president of the United States.”

2. His second attorney general, Bill Barr: “Someone who engaged in that kind of bullying about a process that is fundamental to our system and to our self-government shouldn’t be anywhere near the Oval Office.”

3. His first secretary of defense, James Mattis: “Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people – does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us.”

4. His second secretary of defense, Mark Esper: “I think he’s unfit for office. … He puts himself before country. His actions are all about him and not about the country. And then, of course, I believe he has integrity and character issues as well.”

5. His chairman of the joint chiefs, retired Gen. Mark Milley, seemed to invoke Trump: “We don’t take an oath to a wannabe dictator. We take an oath to the Constitution and we take an oath to the idea that is America – and we’re willing to die to protect it.”

6. His first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson: “(Trump’s) understanding of global events, his understanding of global history, his understanding of US history was really limited. It’s really hard to have a conversation with someone who doesn’t even understand the concept for why we’re talking about this.”

7. His first ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley: “He used to be good on foreign policy and now he has started to walk it back and get weak in the knees when it comes to Ukraine. A terrible thing happened on January 6 and he called it a beautiful day.”

8. His presidential transition vice-chairman, Chris Christie: “Someone who I would argue now is just out for himself.”

9. His second national security adviser, HR McMaster: “We saw the absence of leadership, really anti-leadership, and what that can do to our country.”

10. His third national security adviser, John Bolton: “I believe (foreign leaders) think he is a laughing fool.”

11. His second chief of staff, John Kelly: “A person that has nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law. There is nothing more that can be said. God help us.”

12. His former acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, who resigned as US special envoy to Ireland after January 6, 2021: “I quit because I think he failed at being the president when we needed him to be that.”

13. One of his many former communications directors, Anthony Scaramucci: “He is the domestic terrorist of the 21st century.”

14. Another former communications director, Stephanie Grisham: “I am terrified of him running in 2024.”

15. His secretary of education, Betsy DeVos, who resigned after January 6: “When I saw what was happening on January 6 and didn’t see the president step in and do what he could have done to turn it back or slow it down or really address the situation, it was just obvious to me that I couldn’t continue.”

16. His secretary of transportation, Elaine Chao, who resigned after January 6: “At a particular point the events were such that it was impossible for me to continue, given my personal values and my philosophy.

17. His first secretary of the Navy, Richard Spencer: “…the president has very little understanding of what it means to be in the military, to fight ethically or to be governed by a uniform set of rules and practices.”

18. His first homeland security adviser, Tom Bossert: “The President undermined American democracy baselessly for months. As a result, he’s culpable for this siege, and an utter disgrace.”

19. His former personal lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen: “Donald’s an idiot.”

20. His White House lawyer, Ty Cobb: “Trump relentlessly puts forth claims that are not true.”

21. A former director of strategic communications, Alyssa Farah Griffin, who is now a CNN political commentator: “We can stand by the policies, but at this point we cannot stand by the man.”

22. A top aide in charge of his outreach to African Americans, Omarosa Manigault Newman: “Donald Trump, who would attack civil rights icons and professional athletes, who would go after grieving black widows, who would say there were good people on both sides, who endorsed an accused child molester; Donald Trump, and his decisions and his behavior, was harming the country. I could no longer be a part of this madness.”

23. A former deputy press secretary, Sarah Matthews, who resigned after January 6: “I thought that he did do a lot of good during his four years. I think that his actions on January 6 and the lead-up to it, the way that he’s acted in the aftermath, and his continuation of pushing this lie that the election is stolen has made him wholly unfit to hold office every again.”

24. His final chief of staff’s aide, Cassidy Hutchinson: “I think that Donald Trump is the most grave threat we will face to our democracy in our lifetime, and potentially in American history.”

Aberdeen is a killing field

On a balmy, clear Wednesday last November about 15 minutes after noon, two cars pulled into the parking lot at the YMCA.  The occupant of one car murdered the occupant of the other. The local media reported it this way: "Officers had determined by Wednesday [a week after the incident] that two vehicles pulled into the north entrance of the Aberdeen Family YMCA parking lot and one person shot the other, [Police Capt. Tanner] Johndahl said."  Although the police were called to the scene minutes after it happened, it took a week to figure out that one person shot another.

It took two months for law enforcement to decide there was nothing to do about it.  That included  to not explain to their constituents what happened.

Here is the outline of how the matter was reported:

The police were summoned.

  

The name of the person who was shot had not been released as of the Friday after it happened.

“The individual who is believed to have fired the gunshot was on scene when law enforcement arrived,” per the release.

Life-saving measures with the help of YMCA staff were attempted and the victim was transported to St. Lukes Avera Hospital where he was pronounced dead.

The hospital went on lockdown, but nearby schools and the YMCA didn't. 

The agencies responding were the Aberdeen Police Department, the Brown County Sheriff’s Office, the South Dakota Highway Patrol, the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation, Brown County Emergency Management and Aberdeen Fire & Rescue.

The person believed to have shot the gun was initially detained, but released the following day.

The State's Attorney said the investigation was ongoing.

Six days after the shooting, the name of the victim, Donald Michael Heinz, was released.

More than two months after the shooting, the State's Attorney announced that the shooters name is Trenton Milton, the stand-your-ground  law had been investigated, no charges were filed, and the case is closed.

So, what was the cause or reason for the shooting?

Local law enforcement seems to think its constituents are a bunch of gullible dolts who know nothing and deserve to be kept ignorant.  The premise of democracy is that the people rule and to do so have the right to know what is going on in their government so that they can make intelligent choices.  In this case, as in others, we get this bewildering account of a violent death which gives us no information about the motives and circumstances behind a brazen killing or about the basis for its decisions.

One thing we do know is that democracy in this part of the country is a failure.  In recent years, we have a single party government with no leaders or candidates who note the failures and offer to make the instruments of democratic process work for us again.

Donald Michael Heinz was 70 years old, worked for 43 years at Hub City Manufacturing, and had a family.  When he drove into that parking lot was he in pursuit of Trenton Milton?  Did he have a weapon with which he was menacing Mr. Milton?  What was the relationship between the two men?

There are those who say it's none of our business.  But in a real democracy, the moral and social health of the community is our business, and we need to understand the forces and resolution of this morbid episode.  Is the failure to provide coherent information a matter of dysfunction in law enforcement?  We note that the  sheriff and chief of police promised to address a conflict between their agencies.  Is that conflict part of the cause for the incomprehensible handling of this case?

And, of course, Aberdeen no longer has a full-fledged newspaper, which means that coverage of city hall and the police station doesn't have a journalist devoted to tracking the personalities, issues, and events involved in running the city.  However, I note that the coverage of the city has never been as intensive in Aberdeen as it was for the cities in newspapers for which I worked.

I also note that this incident occurs in the context of some setbacks for the city, the closings of Presentation College and Banner Engineering.  Many other businesses have left town in recent years.

With the handling of this shooting, Aberdeen has become a killing ground.  No explanation has been offered for why Donald Heinz was killed.

That makes Aberdeen a good place to leave.  It's a trend.